In our earlier blog on climate change, we disagreed with some of the standard claims and models about the causes, events, and impacts of human-produced greenhouse gases.
Most scientists and many people believe that humans are the main culprit for the apparent global warming/climate change phenomenon due to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. These scientists accept their limited earth-based models and have unfortunately convinced or conditioned many people to believe that they have “truth.”
Some of them have even declared a climate emergency.
What is an emergency?
– A sudden event which happens unexpectedly and requires immediate action to remedy the situation.
An event, according to their models, won’t be sudden, is expected, and for which we have no current reasonable remedy doesn’t seem like an emergency.
Are these people correct? Does carbon dioxide cause global warming and are humans responsible?
Or are they just some closed-minded non-thinkers who seem to rule science today — much like the government and Pharma improperly rule medical practice? (See our previous blog)
No, they are not correct. And they are part of a strongly biased, dogmatic group.
There is something missing from their data.
Historically, carbon dioxide does not cause global warming. Its increase trails a warming period.
There are those who see things differently from the “official” information-suppressing elite.
And some new evidence supports those who think differently.
Several years ago, some astronomers discovered that other objects in the solar system besides earth were heating up.
If just one solar system body, the earth, showed heating effects, their “official” models might be plausible. But when several bodies, at various distances from the sun — Mars, Jupiter, a moon of Neptune, and Pluto — apparently show similar effects, there is something worthy of more study.
The dogmatic “scientific elite” dismiss the other solar system heating information noted above by calling it “nuts”, or claiming it “could be” due to some other rare situations, but don’t provide any evidence to support their thinking.
The sun has been more active recently. It is heating the earth’s atmosphere, causing it to expand farther into space. SpaceX’s Elon Musk lost about 40 satellites after a launch in February of this year due to increased atmospheric resistance or friction at higher altitudes.
Are the hot, dry summers around the world an indication of this upper atmospheric heating reaching lower levels or the earth’s surface?
A recent report by Henrik Svensmark shows many strong correlations over long periods of time between solar activity and climate change. He also showed that cosmic rays may have some impact on earth’s climate. Cosmic rays are very-high-energy charged atomic particles coming from space. They can interact with the earth’s atmosphere to create aerosols and increase cloud cover.
Our sun blocks some cosmic rays, the amount depending on the level of solar activity. Greater solar activity reduces cosmic rays in our region, while lower activity allows more.
Climate change clearly involves other factors than human contributions. To assign in advance the primary blame to humans for carbon dioxide emissions and ignore these other factors is not valid science. We should be trying to understand the entire picture, not focus on one particular aspect because it fits a particular belief system.
Some even suggest there are cues we are heading for a solar minimum, which could result in a colder climate like the Maunder Minimum. Wouldn’t that be a shock to those elites and people who predict cataclysmic warming?
We still take the position that we don’t need to worry about human global warming activities causing the predicted climatic catastrophes. Even if it were the primary cause — which it isn’t — other factors will intervene to prevent that.
As we declared in our previous blog, one or more of a set of events will occur: 1) a major impact from an external object, 2) a great period of earthquakes and volcanism, 3) a major solar event or change, and/or 4) something unexpected that will overcome anything humans are capable of.
The still currently-planned but outdated twentieth-century concept of wind and solar panel sources will never meet our needs. Someone should determine the numbers of how much we can generate with wind and solar forms and bring some reality into the naive green movement. People won’t like the results.
We recently heard of a person who owned an electric car and thought he was doing the proper thing by having it. When asked where the electricity came from, though, he didn’t know. It comes primarily from burning fossil fuels. Such ignorance of technology is the current status for many people today.
But all is not gloom and doom.
We will soon realize at least one new form of energy which will reduce or eliminate much of our need for oil and gas as fuels. Some people already know of one of these new energy forms. They are unwilling to share at present. They prefer to hold this information for themselves until the time is right for them to exercise their will.